Aksha MedTwin lets MBBS and allied-health students take a history, examine, investigate, and treat AI-simulated patients then hands faculty a report mapped to every CBME competency the encounter touched.
A student may see a single STEMI across an entire posting or none at all. Meanwhile competency-based curricula ask faculty to assess reasoning, for every graduate, in a way that’s consistent and defensible. Aksha MedTwin closes both gaps at once.
Every student meets the rare and the critical case as often as they need — no patient is ever put at risk while they learn.
The same case, the same rigour, for every student — so assessment reflects competence, not luck of the posting.
Each encounter is scored against the competencies the regulator already mandates — evidence, not impressions.
The student meets a simulated patient and works as they would on the ward — asking questions, examining, ordering investigations, and prescribing, all in natural language.
The patient behaves like a real one. Vitals shift with treatment, the wrong drug has consequences, and the clock keeps running — so clinical reasoning is exercised, not recited.
The moment the case ends, faculty receive a competency report across nine CBME domains — with evidence drawn from what the student actually did.
Every case is authored, reviewed, and released with a version tag — so what a student encounters this term is exactly what you signed off on.
ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Time-critical recognition and management under pressure.
EMERGENCY · MBBSRapid stabilisation, differential reasoning, and titrated therapy on a deteriorating patient.
EMERGENCY · MBBSPattern recognition across toxidromes, with antidote selection and supportive care.
EMERGENCY · MBBSPlenty of tools can generate a case. Aksha MedTwin scores it. Every action a student takes is assessed against the competencies your curriculum is already accountable for.
Faculty receive per-student, per-domain evidence — ready for internal assessment and MARB submission — without hand-marking a single encounter.
Each programme is graded against its own regulatory framework — the same engine, the right rubric.
See performance across a whole batch at a glance — spot the competencies a cohort is struggling with before the exam does.
Per-student, per-domain results export cleanly for internal assessment records and MARB submission.
Students enrol under your institution code, so every record and report is scoped to your college and cohort.
Bookend each simulation with MCQ assessment, persisted per student — so learning gain is measured, not assumed.
We’re onboarding pilot partners for the 2026 academic year. See a live encounter, review a sample CBME report, and map it to your programme.
Request a pilot